Thursday, 20 November 2014

28TH Leeds International Film Festival

No One’s Child



I watched this film at Hyde Park Picture House, directed by Vuk Rsumovic from Serbia. This film was based on a true story, which made it even more interesting.
The opening scene begins with a group of men hunting and in the woods they find a small boy, looks to be age nine or ten.
They take him to an orphanage where he is cleaned, shaven and dressed. The boy is silent and non-responding, only to growl or bite when someone leans closer to him.
The audience is not given much information to the boy’s background as the orphanage provide him with a new name and is listed as no known parents.
He joins the orphanage where he is trained in civilian lifestyle, I found the boy’s acting very good, he had very few lines throughout the film but his facial expressions definitely conveyed his thoughts.

The pace of the film is not rushed; it builds up slowly and is able to give a little background to the main characters allowing a better understanding of the story.
The ending is unexpected but after obvious, ‘’ It takes a pack of wolves to raise the young protagonist of “No One’s Child,” and the dogs of of war to drop him back into the abyss’’, this is Guy Lodge’s opening line of the review of No One’s Child.
The style the film was shot aids in showing how the boy Harris’s mind is expanding with the new communication skills he learns at the orphanage. His behaviour gradually improves according to civilian standards and before he joins a group men fighting in the war, he passes the first year of elementary school.


The House at the End of Time

The Venezuelan film produced by Alejandro Hidalgo, was a unique horror film that I watched.
It had the main jumps and scares but with continual shocking twists and turns I found it very interesting and puzzling through the film, until the end when all loose ends were tied together.
The story opens with a woman lying on the floor, injured, she wakes up and in a panic rushes looking for her son Leopoldo, who is being chased by the father.
Then the scene switches to the woman being charged thirty years in jail for the murder of her family. She is then released and the government grants her re-entry to her house, though she is reluctant to return to the place that haunts her.


As days go by, guarded by police in her house, a priest visits her frequently to restore her faith in God while simultaneously solving the mystery, as he does not believe the woman committed the crime.
 The rest is worth watching. The way it has been film definitely keeps the audience on their toes, it does a really good job of weaving through past and present without confusion. Each time it jumps from past to present or present to past, it only reveals subtle details that need to be taken into account to understand the whole story at the end. The visual storytelling techniques were interestingly done. The camera angles were sharp when they needed to be in places and the sound majorly emphasised scary or tense moments. The lighting of the film was dark, this helped emphasise how the characters were feeling, the scenes where the children were playing was always bright conveying the happiness and fun they were experiencing.


I learnt through that only focusing on films released by Hollywood or major movie companies does not always guarantee entertainment. I wish I was able to book more films to watch but the three that I watched were very interesting and the stories told in a unique way by the director.
The quality of the production for these independent films were high and it did not depend on special effects to keep the viewer interested which some movies today I feel do not accomplish, and depend highly on special effects.


No comments:

Post a Comment